For further detail on the facts, see legal update, court of appeal. The facts of this case should be well known to all, but for those who are unaware of them where have you been. Application for leave radmacher v granatino ca bailii, 2008 ewca civ 4 the parties, both foreign nationals, had signed a prenuptial contract in germany before their marriage in england. Radmacher v granatino name of student institution name of instructor date introduction the case between radmacher and granatino involved the court in determining the extent to which an antenuptial agreement should be considered, while the court is exercising its jurisdiction as provided for, under the section, 25 of the matrimonial causes act, enacted in 1973. Heralded as groundbreaking, just what does the decision mean for those seeking to enter into a prenuptial agreement. A french investment banker married a very wealthy german national. In that case, the cfa considered the principles stated by the uk supreme court in radmacher v granatino and noted that the court should give weight to an agreement, made between a couple prior to and in contemplation of their marriage, as to the manner in which their financial affairs should be regulated in the event of their separation in. Mr granatinos appeal from the unanimous court of appeal decision handed down on 3 october 2008 by thorpe, rix and wilson ljj in radmacher is to be heard on monday 22 and tuesday 23 march. Mar 31, 2011 buy family law, fifth edition longman law series 5 by herring, jonathan isbn.
It is clear from the judgment that the orders in relation to the. Mcfarlane v mcfarlane, in which the guiding principles relating to ancillary relief were expressed as fairness, compensation and sharing. If in such a case a prenuptial agreement should provide for no recovery by each spouse from the other in the event of divorce, and the marriage should see the formation of a fortune which each spouse had played an equal role in their. Background katrin radmacher, a german heiress, married nicolas granatino, a successful financier, in 1998. The justices dismissed mr granatino s appeal by a majority of eight to one. Why nuptial agreements are essential in the wealth protection toolkit. Prenups, private autonomy and paternalism radmacher v granatino, court of appeal 2. The radmacher v granatino case became a main point of reference for consultations and guidance programmes on pre nuptial agreements over the following few years. Dec 03, 2019 the year 2020 will mark the 10th anniversary of the landmark uk supreme court case of radmacher v granatino. This book provides a most detailed and careful map of the contours of our contract law. The principles to be applied on an application for a financial remedy where the parties entered into a prenuptial agreement were stated by the supreme court in granatino v radmacher i and have been the subject of much commentary since, as well as being the subject of. The content of a prenuptial agreement can vary widely, but commonly includes provisions for division of property and.
The antenuptial contract at issue in this case was executed in germany in august 1998 by ms radmacher, a german national, and mr granatino. In 2014, the law commission released a report entitled matrimonal property, needs and agreements, which prominently featured the case. The eagerly awaited ruling grappled with one of the hottest current debates in family law namely the enforceability of prenuptial agreements in england and wales. The understanding between ms radmacher and mr granatino when they married. Prior to their marriage they signed a prenuptial agreement in germany where it was valid, which provided that in the event of dissolution of the marriage neither party was to make a monetary claim against the other in any financial remedy proceedings. Supreme court in 2010 upheld the terms of a german marriage contract but it very carefully scrutinized the terms and the consequences of the agreement to determine whether or not they comported with the principle of fairness. Andrew hayward durham law school, durham university the supreme court recently handed down a landmark decision in radmacher v granatino 2010 uksc 42. However, a sharp turn in approach occurred following the decision of the supreme court in radmacher v granatino, with the majority concluding. A prenuptial agreement, antenuptial agreement, or premarital agreement pna, commonly abbreviated as prenup, is a contract entered into prior to marriage, civil union, or any agreement prior to the main agreement by the people intending to marry or contract with each other. The facts in radmacher v granatino were as follows. Lord phillips, lord hope, lord rodger, lord walker, lady hale, lord brown, lord mance, lord collins, lord kerr. Whilst nuptial agreements existed prior to radmacher, there was no certainty they. The eagerly awaited judgment in the matter of radmacher was finally handed down by the supreme court on 20 october 2010.
The much anticipated supreme court judgment in radmacher v. Mar 25, 2015 this is still generally the case, although a 2010 supreme court test case between the german heiress katrin radmacher and nicolas granatino, indicated that such agreements can in the right case have decisive weight in a divorce settlement. A download link of the nineminute interview is also provided. Oct 20, 2010 radmacher formerly granatino respondent v granatino appellant before. Radmacher formerly granatino v gr anatino 2010 uksc 42.
Prenuptial agreements and radmacher feature law gazette. The longawaited judgment of the supreme court in the matrimonial case of radmacher v granatino 2010 uksc 42 was published on 20 october 2010. This means that 10 years have passed during which wealthy individuals have had the opportunity to contract out of the notoriously generous divorce. Granatino 2010 uksc 42 was handed down 20 november 2010. Prior to the supreme court decision in radmacher v granatino,1 separation agreements were. Miss radmacher, 41, had fought a fouryear court battle to withhold the vast majority of her fortune from her exhusband, former investment banker nicolas granatino after he claimed that the. Why nuptial agreements are essential in the wealth. Whilst nuptial agreements existed prior to radmacher, there was no certainty they would. Fairness, freedom and foreign elements marital agreements. Engaging author commentary, a highly readable style and innovative stylistic features to support study and illuminate the complexities of the law. Intention to create legal relations flashcards quizlet. It had provided that on a divorce neither could claim against the other.
Radmacher formerly granatino respondent v granatino. A fathers right to claim child support flair jamaica. Get commentary news coverage in the nationnews commentary section. Jul 29, 2017 i read the decision in the case of radmacher v. In 2010, vardags represented katrin radmacher in a case that culminated in a landmark ruling at the supreme court, changing to the law to make prenuptial agreements enforceable in england and wales. Prior to the marriage, at the request of the wifes family, an antinuptial agreement was signed by both parties. The importance of pre nups the radmacher v granatino case. Developed with all the latest legislative developments and case law in mind, including the human fertilisation and embryology act 2008, r a child 2009, radmacher v granatino 2009 and re ar a child. Jonathan herring contributes to new book on decriminalising abortion. Lady hales comments in the supreme court prenups case continues a. J j w herring, m richards, m johnson and f ebtehaj. The long awaited decision of the extraordinary sitting of 8 male and the only female of the 12 members of the supreme court has resulted in an outcome which again reveals the gender. Historically in england and wales, prenuptial agreements may have been persuasive in helping the court make a final decision regarding a financial settlement. The longawaited judgment of the supreme court in the matrimonial case of radmacher v granatino 2010.
The principles to be applied on an application for a financial remedy where the parties entered into a prenuptial agreement were stated by the supreme court in granatino v radmacher i and have been the subject of much commentary since, as well as being the subject of a law commission consultation and recent report. Radmacher v granatino transformed the way english courts, and indeed the public, regard prenuptial agreements. Kennedy notes, could have been reached 15 years earlier in the case of mckearney v. In radmacher v granatino, the court upheld a prenuptial agreement which prevented a husband from sharing in his wifes fortune, but made an order for a lump sum payment to be made to him and for a house to be made available for him to live in until their children reach age 22. The impact of the human fertilisation and embryology act 2008. Traditionally in english law premarriage contracts have not been enforceable morley 2006. Oct 20, 2010 the case was seen by lawyers as a test of whether prenup agreements were applicable in law in england and wales. Oct 25, 2010 the much anticipated supreme court judgment in radmacher v. Upping the antenuptial agreement joanna miles the recent decision in radmacher v granatino is an important staging post in the development of english laws treatment of prenuptial and other agreements between spouses, providing an analysis and policy direction that contrasts with that offered by the privy council in macleod v macleod. Supreme court rules in favour of prenuptial agreement bbc news.
Case navigator offers unique online support that helps you improve your case reading and analysis skills in family law. Prenuptial agreements the international context flair. Radmacher formerly granatino v granatino 2010 uksc 42 issue 22 radmacher v granatino the natural inferenceof teh prenuptial agreement introduction. Applying these principles to the facts of the case, the supreme court. The supreme court in radmacher focused on two key issues. Much of the academic commentary and judicial decision is. Prenuptial agreements have historically not been considered legally valid in the united kingdom. Given the divorce rate, people should be able to enter into prenuptial. With regard to prenuptial agreements the supreme court case of radmacher formerly granatino v granatino prenuptial contract 2010 uksc 42, 2010 3 fcr 583, gave us fairly strong guidance and has made the position regarding prenuptial agreements much clearer. Radmacher v granatino prenups have always divided opinion but, whether you see them as sensible or cynical, it cannot be denied that they give couples greater control over their marriage. Sheffield city council v e commentary in r hunter, c mcglynn and e rackley eds, feminist judgments hart 2010.
The wife had very substantial assets, the husband had few. The french husband and german wife signed their antenuptial agreement in germany on 1 august 1998. Validity of antinuptial agreement providing neither party should benefit from the others property. The supreme court decided by a majority of 8 to 1 lady hale dissenting that the court of appeal had been correct to conclude there were no factors that rendered it unfair to hold mr granatino to the terms of his prenuptial agreement with ms radmacher. Aug 21, 2012 developed with all the latest legislative developments and case law in mind, including the human fertilisation and embryology act 2008, r a child 2009, radmacher v granatino 2009 and re ar a child. The english supreme court is expected to deliver its judgement in the case of radmacher v granatino. In the landmark supreme court decision in radmacher v granatino, the. Jul 08, 2009 attorney robert mues was recently interviewed by the bbcs late show with big george about his thoughts on the landmark uk court decision, radmacher v. The supreme courts longawaited decision in radmacher formerly granatino v granatino 2010 uksc 42, 2011 1 flr 1851 has been criticised by some as a blow against the status and. Judges back prenuptial agreements for britain as katrin. Granatino and agreed to be interviewed a few hours later by big george wembly, the host of the live late show on bbclondon radio station 94.
Jonathan herring is a fellow in law at exeter college, university of oxford. Radmacher formerly granatino v granatino 2010 uksc 42. Oct 21, 2010 miss radmacher, 41, had fought a fouryear court battle to withhold the vast majority of her fortune from her exhusband, former investment banker nicolas granatino after he claimed that the. Pearson family law, fifth edition, 5e jonathan herring. Appeal before the supreme court concerning the question of whether the court of appeal erred in finding that prenuptial contracts ought to be given decisive weight, where entered into freely by both parties, in an assessment under section 25 of the matrimonial causes act 1973. The prenuptial agreement was not so defective as to render it unfair. Nov 02, 2010 the facts of radmacher v granatino go against that vignette which is why lady hales dissent in the supreme court is truly noteworthy. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. The court ruled in favour of katrin radmacher and said that decisive weight should be given to the prenuptial agreement that was signed by katrin radmacher and nicholas granatino in germany. Hitting the airwaves with big george on the bbc ohio. Nov 16, 2010 this happened in our own supreme court a couple of weeks ago, in radmacher formerly granatino v granatino 2010 ukhl 42 pdf. This case commentary examines the reasoning in both decisions, which raise various questions for the law commission to consider as it embarks on its project on marital property agreements. Attorney robert mues was recently interviewed by the bbcs late show with big george about his thoughts on the landmark uk court decision, radmacher v. We believe every one of us deserves equal access to factbased news and analysis.
Oct 20, 2010 the muchanticipated supreme court judgment in radmacher v granatino has now been handed down, and the justices found in favour of heiress katrin radmacher. Relocation 2010, this is the ideal textbook for all students of family or child law today. In 2014, the law commission released a report entitled matrimonal property, needs and agreements. Granatino, but the nuances between the two forms of. Why nuptial agreements are essential in the wealth protection. The case was seen by lawyers as a test of whether prenup agreements were applicable in law in england and wales. This means that 10 years have passed during which wealthy individuals have had the opportunity to contract out of the notoriously generous divorce jurisdiction of the english and welsh courts. Perhaps that explains why hale was the sole dissenter in radmacher v granatino last week, a case in which the majority of the supreme court judges overturned hales ruling in an earlier case. For example, in radmacher v granatino, although prenuptial agreements are void as being contrary to public policy, the english supreme court upheld a prenuptial agreement which was valid under german law.
This happened in our own supreme court a couple of weeks ago, in radmacher formerly granatino v granatino 2010 ukhl 42 pdf. The muchanticipated supreme court judgment in radmacher v granatino has now been handed down, and the justices found in favour of heiress katrin radmacher. The value of dissent matthew ryder law the guardian. Whilst nuptial agreements existed prior to radmacher, there was no certainty they would be. The supreme court, with a majority of 81, dismissed granatinos appeal and affirmed the court of appeals earlier decision. Radmacher v granatino the impact on future prenups. The case concerned whether and to what extent a court should take an antenuptial agreement into account in exercising its discretion under section 25 of the matrimonial causes act 1973. The authors do not claim to have referred to every case which might be found on some database somewhere but they do hope to have covered. For example, in granatino v radmacher 2010 where the uk supreme court had to decide whether or not to give effect to the parties prenuptial agreement that neither party would seek to make a claim to property belonging to the other party if they got divorced there was no issue as to whether that agreement was intended to be legally. Mar 03, 2011 andrew hayward durham law school, durham university the supreme court recently handed down a landmark decision in radmacher v granatino 2010 uksc 42.
The year 2020 will mark the 10th anniversary of the landmark uk supreme court case of radmacher v granatino. And now, thanks to ayesha vardags tenacity, couples who do take this. In order to address the facts of this particular case it will be necessary, in. Radmacher v granatino transformed the way english courts regard prenuptial agreements. Compton bros 1925, hl lords held that an honorable pledge excluded legal rights, case concerned 1 an overreaching import arragmegment which was stated to be not entered intoas a formal or legal. Radmacher v granatino vardags guide international divorce. Afua hirschs law blog the german heiress and the prenup. The recent decision in radmacher v granatino is an important staging post in the development of english laws treatment of prenuptial and other agreements between spouses, providing an analysis and policy direction that contrasts with that offered by the privy council in macleod v macleod. The case concerned a german heiress and her french husband, a banker. The justices dismissed mr granatinos appeal by a majority of eight to one. This approach is not novel, but it is consistent with english.
From this case, one could conclude that the focus should be placed on ensuring that the agreement conforms with the laws of the country in. Oct 20, 2010 radmacher formerly granatino respondent v granatino appellant judgment date. In 2010, vardags represented katrin radmacher in a case that culminated in a landmark. This is still generally the case, although a 2010 supreme court test case between the german heiress katrin radmacher and nicolas granatino, indicated that such agreements can in the right case have decisive weight in a divorce settlement. The husband is french and the wife, who is of substantial wealth, is german. Andrew hayward durham law school, durham universitythe supreme court recently handed down a landmark decision in radmacher v granatino 2010 uksc 42. Talitha brookman discusses the recent radmacher v granatino case and its likely impact on prenuptial agreements in the future.
879 1403 472 303 1376 800 47 1307 255 567 1173 1213 1322 1107 1472 930 504 488 754 1156 1053 1147 1403 775 697 989 395 289 1144 176